Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:51

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Donkey Kong Bananza Is Officially the Best-Selling Game on Amazon Right Now - IGN
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
My boyfriend won’t tell me his past and it hurts me so I broke up with him what do I do?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Report: Leafs discussed 3-way deal at deadline to send Marner to Vegas - theScore.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why do Democrats claim to be Americans when they are actually Globalists?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Australia vs South Africa: Proteas win World Test Championship final at Lord's - BBC
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Senate expected to pass crypto bill without addressing Trump’s investments - AP News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ananda Lewis, Celebrated MTV VJ, Dead at 52 - Rolling Stone
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?